HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI
MACEDONIA
Human Rights Developments
During 1997, the government in Macedonia made some progress toward
consolidating democracy. But human rights violations persisted, especially against
non-ethnic Macedonians, placing the government’s commitment to international law in
question and shaking the country’s already fragile ethnic balance.
The most serious issue was the discriminatory treatment of ethnic
Albanians who, according to the Macedonian government, make up 23 percent of the
population. Albanians, like ethnic Turks and Roma, are grossly underrepresented in state
structures such as the police, even in areas where they constitute a clear majority of the
local population.
An unresolved point of contention was the right to higher education in
languages other than Macedonian. An Albanian-language private university in Tetovo was
allowed to operate during 1997, although the government refused to recognize its diplomas.
Rector of the university, Fadil Sulejmani, was released from prison on February 1, after
serving ten months of a twelve month sentence for resisting the police when the university
first opened in 1995. A draft law on higher education under consideration in 1997 would
prohibit higher education in any languages other than Macedonian.
Another controversy involved the public display of foreign flags in
Macedonia, particularly the state flags from neighboring Albania and Turkey. In early
1997, newly-elected local governments run by ethnic Albanians in the western towns of
Tetovo and Gostivar hoisted the Albanian and Turkish state flags outside their municipal
halls. The Macedonian constitutional court prohibited the action, but its decision was
ignored by the local governments, despite many warnings.
On July 8, parliament passed a law on the use of flags in Macedonia
that allowed the flags of other states to be flown at any time on private property or
during sporting events and alongside the Macedonian state flag on state buildings during
national holidays. The next day the Ministry of Interior ordered the police to remove the
flags from the Tetovo and Gostivar town halls. An estimated 10,000 ethnic Albanians
attempted to hinder the police and violent clashes ensued. According to the government,
the police came under attack, fired in the air and then used force where necessary to
subdue the crowd and perform their duties. However, according to ethnic Albanian leaders,
witnesses, and local human rights organizations, such as the Helsinki Committee for Human
Rights of the Republic of Macedonia, the police used excessive force against individuals
who were not offering any resistance, or had ceased to resist, resulting in the death of
three ethnic Albanians, Shpend Hyseni, Nazmi Salihu, and Milaim Dauti. At least one
hundred other people were treated for injuries in the local hospital, mostly for wounds on
the head and shoulders. During and after the clash, the police searched homes in the area
without a warrant, arresting approximately 300 people. Many of the detained were denied
their constitutional rights, such as access to a lawyer or information on the reason for
their arrest.
The mayor of Gostivar, Rufi Osmani, was arrested and charged with
ignoring a court ruling, organizing armed guards and inciting national and racial hatred.
After fifty-three days in pre-trial detention, he was sentenced to thirteen years, eight
months in prison. The head of the Gostivar city council, the mayor of Tetovo, and the head
of the Tetovo city council received sentences ranging from two and a half to three years
in prison. According to the Greek Helsinki Monitor, which observed the Osmani trial, due
process irregularities violated the defendant’s right to a fair trial, most seriously
the court’s unwillingness to admit any witnesses on behalf of the defense. The
thirteen-year, eight-month sentence for Osmani also struck many observers as exceedingly
high. By contrast, earlier in the year, ethnic Macedonian students had used highly
aggressive and xenophobic slogans during demonstrations against the expanded use of the
Albanian language at the Pedagogical Faculty in Skopje, but they had not been charged with
inciting racial hatred.
Other criminal proceedings in 1997, including those against ethnic
Macedonians, were marked by irregularities and violations of due process. A new code of
penal procedure came into effect on April 11 that brought Macedonian law up to European
standards, but local human rights groups still reported cases in which a person’s period
of detention exceeded the twenty-four hours allowed by law, the police failed to inform a
detainee of the reason for his or her arrest, or the police denied the defendant access to
a lawyer.
Police abuse was a problem against all Macedonian citizens, regardless
of their ethnicity, although non-ethnic Macedonians were especially susceptible to abuse.
Most allegations were of ill-treatment during the time of arrest or in police stations.
The Albanian Party of Democratic Prosperity complained that its members were harassed and,
on occasion, detained and abused by the police.
As in previous years, the fairness of elections in Macedonia was
questioned in late 1996 and 1997. According to local human rights organizations, there
were incomplete voting lists in the local elections in November and December 1996. In some
polling stations, the number of unregistered voters was as high as 20 percent. The
state-financed media, both electronic and print, was biased in favor of the ruling Social
Democratic Union, which won the elections.
A proposed law on religion also came under criticism for distinguishing
between the major “traditional” religions and “new” religious groups. In 1997, the
Macedonian government continued to deny recognition of the Serbian Orthodox Church in
Macedonia. Two clergymen from the Serbian Orthodox Church in Serbia, Bishop Irinej Bulovic
and Archdeacon Radovan Bigovic, were refused entry into Macedonia to attend an
international conference in Skopje on October 26.
The Right to Monitor
Human Rights Watch is not aware of any government attempts to
restrict or hinder the work of human rights monitors in Macedonia.
The Role of the International Community
United Nations and the Oraganization for Security and Cooperateion in
Europe
The international community’s priority was to maintain the
territorial integrity and political stability of Macedonia. Toward this end, a United
Nations Preventive Deployment Force (UNPREDEP) and an Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) mission continued to monitor and report on the internal and
external threats to the country. While providing a necessary element of security, in the
name of stability, both organizations voiced little public criticism of human rights
violations committed by the Macedonian government. The UNPREDEP mission, whose mandate was
extended until November 30, was scaled down in 1997 from 1050 to 750 members, mostly from
Scandinavian countries and the United States. During the crisis in Albania, it helped
monitor the border and avert potential clashes. The U.N. special rapporteur on the former
Yugoslavia, Elizabeth Rehn, criticized certain violations in 1997, especially the use of
excessive force by the police in Gostivar, but praised the Macedonian government’s
“considerable progress in the protection of human rights.” She proposed that Macedonia
be removed from her mandate.
European Union
A Cooperation Agreement between Macedonia and the European Union
came into effect on December 1, 1996. The agreement provides an a ECU 150 million credit
line to Macedonia for infrastructure projects and is a step toward Macedonia’s associate
membership in the EU.
United States
The United States repeatedly stressed its support for the
territorial integrity and multi-ethnicity of Macedonia, making clear to ethnic Albanian
leaders that it encouraged cooperation within government rather than the establishment of
parallel structures. The U.S. considered Macedonia a vital buffer between the competing
interests of Bulgaria, Albania, Serbia, and Greece. In order to support the government of
Kiro Gligorov, however, the U.S. failed strongly to criticize human rights abuses that
took place in 1997, such as the police abuse in Gostivar. Close military cooperation
within the framework of NATO’s Partnership for Peace continued throughout the year.