FOREWORD
‘Every subject has a right to his culture; no culture has any right
upon the subject’
Robert Lafont (1986:16)
Since their creation, both Minority Rights Group - Greece (1992) and Greek Helsinki
Monitor (1993) have carried out extensive research on Greece’s minorities, and
especially on ethnolinguistic minorities. Moreover, the organizations’ spokesperson,
Panayote Elias Dimitras, in 1993-1994, was a member of the Scientific Committee of the
Euromosaic research group: the latter was assigned, and financed, by the Commission of the
European Communities the preparation of the new report on the some 45 minority linguistic
communities in the EU’s twelve (at the time) countries. This is why we were planning to
publish an issue devoted to these minorities in the May - June 1994 issue of the Greek
Monitor of Human and Minority Rights.
Unfortunately, the work of the Euromosaic team was well below expectations, and this is
why no EU report was ever published. In the case of the minorities in Greece, the research
centers assigned with their coverage initially ignored the Greek member of the Scientific
Committee totally; they proceeded with the selection of ‘language experts’ who were
sometimes unknown to the communities themselves, and/or -even worse- hostile to their
survival and to their linguistic and cultural rights; in one case, they merely appealed to
some emigre, from one such community, living in Germany whose only qualification was his
activism.
So, mid-way, the researchers had come up with draft reports on four of the five
communities (Arvanites, Vlachs, Pomaks, Macedonians, and Turks) not only of mediocre or
even poor quality, but also with errors and judgments that would have totally discredited
the work in the eyes of even the well-meaning Greek readership. After some soul-searching,
the researchers asked the Greek expert to write the final reports, and availed him of a
token budget.
However, while the work was near completion, one of the two researchers refused to
provide the Greek expert with the documentation he had collected and withdrew the budget
promised. As, unfortunately, the competent office of the Commission did nothing to make
this researcher honor his commitment, the Greek expert turned in the necessary reports
only on Arvanites, Vlachs and Pomaks, whereas he also provided the necessary data for the
map of Greece with the spread of the minority languages. As we said before, because of
similar problems in other countries, nothing has come out of this work, which had
nevertheless received a lot of money from the EU, i.e. its taxpayers, money that can be
considered wasted.
This frustrating experience made it impossible to publish our issue on time; in fact,
given other commitments, we had to postpone it through the very end of 1995. The material
our organizations had been gathering for years is reflected in these reports, one of which
is an updating of the MRG-Greece contribution to an MRG International publication on the
Southern Balkans.
Two ethnolinguistic minorities are missing. The Turks, because we needed to update a
previous report published in 1990; and the Roma (usually known as Gypsies), on whom we
plan to do work in 1996. In any case, our organizations consider that, however extensively
researched, our reports are far from definite: we will therefore appreciate and take into
consideration all comments we will receive.