|
|
NGOs
and all observers of the human rights scene in Greece welcomed
Minister of Justice Mihalis Stathopoulos’ initiative to remove the
entry on religion from Greek identity cards. The reform led to a
protracted crisis in Greece with opposition to it led by the Orthodox
Church. Though the government steadfastly repeats that the new
identity cards will be used it has yet to introduce them. In the
meantime, the Church of Greece has launched a petition drive to gather
millions of signatures so as to pressure the government to back down
or organize a referendum on the matter: the opposition leader himself
publicly signed it.
More
important reforms, pertaining to freedom of religion and related
concerns, that need to be introduced include:
-
Abolition
of the punitive character of the conscientious objectors’
civilian service by considerably reducing its duration. Court
convictions of objectors should be erased from their criminal
record, as they obstruct the objectors’ professional
advancement, as the ECHR has stipulated in this year’s
conviction of Greece in the Thlimmenos case.
-
Election
of the management committees of the wakfs (promised before
the elections by the Minister of the Interior). Thorough revision
of the procedure for the selection of the muftis, which
must be carried out in a way that will ensure the general
acceptance of the Muslims. Mosques must be opened in areas where
there is a considerable number of Muslims, throughout the country.
The
European Court of Human Rights also convicted Greece for the case of
Ibraim Serif on 14 December 1999. Mr. Serif was elected the Mufti of
Komotini in 1990 by those attending Friday prayers at the mosques. He
was subsequently convicted by a Greek court for pretense of authority
because of messages he issued, and as he was wearing the mufti’s
clothes. The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of
Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Here is a quote
from the Court’s press release:
"In
the Court’s view, punishing a person for the mere fact that he
acted as the religious leader of a group that willingly followed him
could hardly be considered compatible with the demands of religious
pluralism in a democratic society. Moreover, the Court did not
consider that, in democratic societies, the State needed to take
measures to ensure that religious communities remained or were
brought under a unified leadership. The Court recognized that it was
possible that tension was created in situations where a religious or
any other community became divided. However, it considered that this
was one of the unavoidable consequences of pluralism. The role of
the authorities in such circumstances was not to remove the cause of
tension by eliminating pluralism, but to ensure that the competing
groups tolerated each other."
Regrettably,
Greek authorities decided to disregard this case-law, and continued in
2000 to prosecute the other elected mufti, Mehmet Emin Aga, with
exactly the same charges, because he has issued some 50 messages to
the Muslims on religious holidays, signing them as Mufti of Xanthi. To
this day, First Instance Courts have convicted him to 139 months
imprisonment. Appeal Courts have reduced the sentences of seven cases
from 114 months to 69 months. Mr. Aga has spent six months in prison
and has bought off the balance, at considerable financial cost.
It
is important to mention that the then minority deputies appealed the
rival appointments by the state of muftis in Xanthi and Komotini to
the Council of State, in 1991 (MP Faik Faikoglu) and 1990 (MP Sadik
Ahmet) respectively. For a whole decade, the country’s higher
administrative court, in violation of Greek and international law and
any sense of decency, has been postponing the hearing of the cases,
year after year after year. It obviously hopes that in that way it
will delay possible recourses to the ECHR
On
another matter, on 13 June 2000, Hara Kalomoiri was convicted by an
Appeals Court of Salonica to a suspended sentence of two months in
prison for having operated, between September 1994 and March 1995, a
house of worship without state license. The verdict refers to a
residential center in Halkidiki (near Salonica and Mount Athos), whose
Hara Kalomoiri was an administrator until 1995. The court inferred the
building was a "temple of Buddhist cult" because its
residents "engaged in Buddhist acts of cult, concretely … in
meditation." Considering meditation as an act of cult is
inadmissible, and certainly a violation of freedom of expression and
of religion.
|