GREEK
HELSINKI MONITOR
(Greek National
Committee of the International Helsinki Federation)
& MINORITY RIGHTS GROUP
- GREECE
(Greek Affiliate of Minority Rights Group International)
P.O. Box 51393, GR-14510
Kifisia, Greece Tel. 30-1-620.01.20; Fax: 30-1-807.57.67; E-mail: office@greekhelsinki.gr

5/5/1999
TOPIC: GREEK GOVERNMENT REPORT
ON THE HUMANITARIAN SITUATION IN FR YUGOSLAVIA
Greek Helsinki Monitor and Minority Rights
Group-Greece have obtained a copy of the document "Humanitarian Situation in FR
Yugoslavia. Report and Proposal of the Government of Greece." The report was prepared
following a mid-April visit in Serbia (including Kosovo) of Special Envoy of the Greek
Foreign Minister Alex Rondos, who has a solid NGO background. For these reasons, we
consider the document of wider interest and reflecting the situation in the field, though
written with the necessary diplomatic precautions, as it will be distributed to foreign
governments.

HUMANITARIAN SITUATION IN THE
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
Report and Proposal of the
Government of Greece
[Prepared following the visit of the
Special Envoy for Humanitarian Affairs of the Foreign Minister of Greece]
1. Introduction
The visit to the FRY occurred between April 15-22.
Meetings were held with officials of both the Federal Government and the government of the
Republic of Serbia. The main purpose of the visit was to obtain a general perspective of
the humanitarian situation in the FRY and particularly with regard to the situation in
Kosovo.
The government of Greece was encouraged to provide as
such assistance as it could. Delivery of assistance into Kosovo by Greece was also
welcomed.
2. Serbia
Damage and Impact: The situation in Serbia is rapidly
deteriorating. The bombings have severely damaged a wide variety of economic facilities
and economic infrastructure. Jobs have been lost; small businesses which had become part
of the survival mechanism for many Yugoslavs during sanctions are not operating; the
health and social welfare provision network is being undermined by diminishing medical
supplies and the disruption of normal transport routes. These immediate effects of the
bombing compound the difficulties previously experienced by vulnerable groups in Serbia
during the long period of sanctions. Specific incidents have occurred with the bombing
that cause localized emergencies: destruction of factories and attendant ecological
damage; interruption of water supplies to some urban centers; damage to social service
centers.
The long-term effects of the bombing are currently
incalculable. Serbia is being economically amputated limp by limb: Belgrade is now cut off
from Vojvodina; access to Montenegro is extremely difficult; major factories, oil
refineries and other strategically vital economic assets are being systematically
destroyed. Only the electrical grid remains intact, for the present. General work of
government continues though disrupted by the continued shifting of government offices.
Special mention should be made of the situation
regarding civic life: with the bombing many civic groups active in human rights,
representation of communities such as refugees and in service provision have closed their
doors for want of finance and out of fear. These people who represent civic life and
action are being asphyxiated under these circumstances. While they do not necessarily
represent a democratic alternative, they represent the infrastructure of open civic life
for the future. Their disappearance is an agonizing problem for those who see such issues
as essential to the issues of justice and humanitarianism.
The vulnerable population currently include: (a) the
elderly who were dependent of very small pensions and who now have little access to the
market or to assistance, (b) Serb refugees from Bosnia, Krajina and now Kosovo who were
largely dependent on assistance in the past and for whom the bombing is something both
terrifying and incomprehensible: for these there should be special attention given in the
years to come. While society strives to retain a semblance of normality under what are,
officially, conditions of war, the effects will have an increasing corrosive effect on
children the longer the bombing lasts. This, despite a prodigious propaganda effort to
shore up morale in the country.
Management of Humanitarian programs is officially
under the authority of the Federal Ministry of Health. Items brought to FRY are meant to
be handed over at a number of selected frontier posts for onward over at a number of
selected frontier posts for onward distribution by the authorities. Much of this is being
done by the Yugoslav Red Cross. Currently, the only official exception to this system is
the Serbian Orthodox Church. The Government of Greece has been able to negotiate
independent operations. With one exception (to International orthodox Christian Charities
(IOCC) which has continued operations at a significantly more modest level since the
bombing began. ` Priority Needs: There are four categories: (a) medical supplies for the
official health care system (b) supplementary food and hygiene supplies for traditionally
vulnerable groups, notably the previous refugee caseload (c) psycho-social support for
those currently traumatized and (d) discrete support to NGOs which have been providing
some degree of independent service to communities.
The absence of fuel will undoubtedly restrict most
humanitarian initiatives in Serbia.
3. Montenegro:
This mission did not visit Montenegro and is not
qualified to comment on the situation there. From a distance one can offer the following
observations, however : (a) the influx of refugees from Kosovo has added to the already
swollen ranks of displaced Albanians in Montenegro (b) this has stretched the already
limited capacity of that Republic to handle social issues; (c) relations with Serbia are
not easy and the related tension adds to the difficulties there; (d) some international
NGOs have remained; (e) there are humanitarian supplies still stocked at the port of Bar
which need to be appropriately distributed provided there are adequate logistical support
and supplies.
4. Kosovo
Two days were spent in Kosovo. These involved
discussions with officials in Pristina, a visit to the Pristina hospital; site visits to
Podujevo obstina, site visits on the raid to and from Prizren.
General impressions are the following:
**empty streets in the main urban centers (many
staying inside out of fear)
**numerous but not all villages empty, with ground
lying fallow, animals roaming untended, houses selectively destroyed through ground
operations. It is as if history stopped in an instant: damage is not comprehensive (which
is some consolation from the point of view of reconstruction).
** physical destruction from bombing is closely
linked to military targets and does not appear to have followed the more strategic
economic targeting in Serbia. Roads and bridges were generally passable.
Quantified data on population, their location and
movement is currently impossible. There are some trends that must be noted for operational
purposes:
a. Albanians and Serbs have fled Serbs to relative
north of Kosovo, Albanians to the neighbouring countries and into the mountains within
Kosovo.
b. Based on previous estimates of the Kosovo
population and current figures of refugees, there are some 800,000 people left in Kosovo.
Of these at least half, if not more are in the mountains;
c. C. The frontier is fairly well controlled and the
FRY authorities open and close the tap at will.
d. There is evidence of people returning from the
mountains [This mission saw some 20,000 Albanians returning towards Podujevo obstina on
April 21/22].
e. This trend can be explained in the following
manner: FRY military/police units, staying just ahead of bombing, are able to attack now
weakened KLA units, driving them away and leaving the civilians exposed. These civilians
are then informed by the local authorities that they may return with impunity. This
mission was informed that the same would be done at the FYROM frontier and in the area
between Pec and Decani.
The conditions of those returning from the mountains
are poor but not catastrophic: they will become as the weeks progress and if they do not
have access to food, clean water and medical supplies. Those returning to Podujevo were
suffering from exposure; they were extremely dirty (unwashed, same old clothes, lice
etc.), fear of infection s as the climate warms. One can only presume that the longer they
stay in the mountains the deterioration of their physical conditions will deteriorate
rapidly. Brief interviews indicated that they descend from the mountains in search of
food, medicine and now security.
Access in Kosovo defined in the following way:
a. Most main roads are secure.
b. Some side roads are not secure because of
continued operations (it is claimed) against KLA [One can also presume it might be
operations to empty out some locations of their local population].
c. The mountain areas, where many displaced are
located, are currently inaccessible.
Institutional authority and obstacles: The Kosovo
Executive Council is nominally in charge and has extended its good offices for
cooperation. The security officials have the final say (they were well aware of this
mission and proved cooperative). Local community institutions do not exist (the Mother
Teresa Society is no longer operational, though some of its volunteers may be found in the
mountains and among surviving communities). The Yugoslav Red Cross is operational, claims
authority for distribution but has, in the past, suffered from a poor reputation in the
eyes of the Albanian community: work with them may hamper confidence building.
Programming of issues: It is necessary to establish
very tight communications: local authorities must be closely informed of intended
targeting; NATO must be informed on truck movements; Belgrade and Kosovo authorities must
be informed of convoy timing and destinations.
Programming needs: Immediate assistance (building on
the current Greek pipeline into Pristina from Skopje), must include:
a. Family food parcels, individuals or family hygiene
parcels. These are for direct distribution to families in need throughout the region, with
special attention to those locations where there are displaced returning.
b. Specialized medical supplies for hospitals and
health centers to address severe cases of sickness and wounds from shrapnel.
c. Medical authorities should indicate what type of
vaccination campaign can be carried out.
Programming proposal for Kosovo:
This program must be guided by speed, flexibility,
sound back up for security (NATO and on the ground) and careful supervision of targeting
and distribution.
a. Propositioning of stocks in Skopje (or Sofia and
Thessaloniki).
b. Contracting of at least 50 10-ton trucks to
maintain regular flow.
c. Caseload of up to 400,000 individuals is the
target.
d. Primary Kosovo warehousing in Pristina
e. E. Onward distribution to locations throughout
Kosovo based upon (1) local knowledge of displaced return (2) due notification to NATO of
truck movements (3) placement of Greek staff in secondary distribution sites.
f. Establishment of office in Pristina to manage
programming.
g. Establish liaison in Belgrade to ensure
coordination with Belgrade authorities (customs, Immigration etc.) |