BOSTON GLOBE
Democracy activism: a war
casualty
Milosevic foes say bombs stifle
them
By Kevin Cullen, Globe
Staff, 05/26/99
BELGRADE - The Western allies want to replace President
Slobodan Milosevic's regime with a more democratic government, but one of the casualties
of NATO's bombing campaign has been the democracy movement here, pro-Western activists
say.
Interviews with activists, dissidents, and intellectuals
suggest that those who want Yugoslavia to have a more open, Western-style democracy
believe that the NATO bombing has killed what little credibility they had with ordinary
Serbs longing for the certainties of life they had under communist rule.
Rather than blame Milosevic for making his country the
pariah of the international community, most people are said to feel that NATO has
unjustifiably targeted them with its bombs, killing innocent civilians and causing
hardship by cutting electricity and water supplies.
Those who have fought a lonely battle to wean Yugoslavia
from authoritarianism say NATO's bombing campaign has silenced them and emboldened the
Milosevic regime.
''We are the collateral damage of this war,'' said Dujan
Masic, who heads an association of independent journalists. ''How do you talk about human
rights and building democracy when the world's leading democracies are bombing you?''
The simple answer, prodemocracy activists say, is that you
don't. Since the war began, the government has passed laws that allow it to hold people
without charge for up to 60 days. People are wary of saying anything that could be
construed as critical of the government. And still others who want to criticize the
government can't bring themselves to do it because they are as angry, if not more so, at
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
It is not just prodemocracy activists who question NATO's
bombing. Jiri Dienstbier, the United Nations human rights investigator in the former
Yugoslavia, believes the NATO raids have effectively destroyed the pro-democracy movement.
Goran Milicevic, a professor at the University of Belgrade
and a leading dissident, said the prodemocracy movement ''collapsed overnight'' when the
bombing began.
Public confidence in prodemocracy groups has also
declined. Natasha Kandic, director of the Humanitarian Law Center here, said people simply
stopped coming to her office.
''The people are afraid,'' she said. ''Emergency laws were
a clear sign that everybody is in danger. It is better to be quiet or focus on the NATO
bombardment.''
Dissent was further chilled by the April 11 assassination
of Slavko Curuvija, editor of an influential newspaper and magazine that was critical of
the Milosevic regime. Curuvija was gunned down on his doorstep in broad daylight.
The government denies that state agents had anything to do
with Curuvija's slaying and suggest that he had crossed organized crime groups who were
determined to get rid of him.
But that slaying, and the selective arrests and
interrogations of those who criticize the government, has led many dissidents to conclude
that discretion is the better course. Many will not talk on the telephone. Some even
changed e-mail addresses, until they learned the government controls the internet
providers.
Vojin Dimitrijevic has spent much of his life advocating
for human rights in a country where to do so was to court arrest. But Dimitrijevic
believes NATO has set the democracy movement back more than anything Milosevic has done in
the past decade.
''In the long run, the biggest collateral damage of this
war is the shattered possibilities for democracy,'' says Dimitrijevic, a law professor and
director of the Belgrade Center for Human Rights. ''We envy those who are afraid only of
bombs.''
In the handful of cities and towns where there has been
open criticism of government policy over Kosovo, people have been arrested, discouraging
other potential critics, human rights activists say.
''You hear statements that the war should end, but that's
as far as they can go,'' said Milicevic. ''I would be utterly surprised if there were
street protests, even if we didn't have water for a week. It's not a question of civic
courage. It's a question of valuing your life. No one's died of stinking, but people have
died of bullets.''
Student activists considered holding a street protest
against Milosevic two months ago. But, said one of the student leaders, Stanimir
Miljkovic, the plan was dropped when the students considered the likely international
reaction.
''Madeleine Albright would get on television and point to
our protest as evidence that NATO's strategy was working, so we would be inviting more
bombs on our people,'' said Miljkovic, who contends the bombing is counterproductive and
inhumane.
Besides being critical of NATO's bombing campaign,
prodemocracy activists feel the West has paid lip service to their cause.
''There will be no real peace or stability in this region
unless we get on the road to democracy and a market economy,'' Dimitrijevic said. ''But
the international community has never really seriously considered this.''
Instead, Dimitrijevic said, the West economically and
politically isolated Yugoslavia, a policy that has only helped what he calls
''authoritarian and xenophobic extremists.''
Prodemocracy groups have scaled back their efforts. Rather
than hold street demonstrations, as in 1996 and 1997, students use a Web site to argue for
a more open society. Miljkovic said the site gets about 2,500 hits a day, most from
outside Serbia.